St. John's Journal of Legal Commentary 16 (winter). The Court disagreed and upheld Presser's conviction. Many people want more laws to prevent people from owning guns. Others adhere to an insurrection theory, under which the Second Amendment not only grants the personal right to bear arms, it gives citizens the right to rebel against a government perceived as tyrannical. Most center on the Original Intent of the Framers. This illegal and non-solution to a non-problem is not meaningless. Two men were also charged with threatening public officials. "Revolt of the Masses: Armed Civilians and the Insurrectionary Theory of the Second Amendment." Please select which sections you would like to print: Corrections? Not surprisingly, courts are conflicted over how to resolve this debate. Congress has also asserted the power to regulate firearms. However, despite the use of “person” in that clause, the McDonald decision did not apply to noncitizens, because one member of the majority, Justice Clarence Thomas, refused in his concurring opinion to explicitly extend the right that far. 2003). According to the Court in Miller, the Second Amendment does not guarantee the right to own a firearm unless the possession or use of the firearm has "a reasonable relationship to the preservation or efficiency of a well regulated militia.". Lastly, they argue that the Constitution should be interpreted in accordance with a changing society and that the destructive capability of semiautomatic and automatic firearms was not envisioned by the Framers. Nevertheless, the meaning and scope of the amendment have long been decided by the Supreme Court. Private militias have been formed by individuals in America since the colonial period. Hoppin, Jason. "Ninth Circuit Upholds Controversial Ruling on Second Amendment." "Stockpiling Weapons: Can Private Militias Receive Protection under the First and Second Amendments?" No law regulating firearms has ever been struck down by the Supreme Court as a violation of the Second Amendment. Under the first section of the Fourteenth Amendment, passed in 1868, states may not abridge the Privileges and Immunities of citizens of the United States. If the Second Amendment protects only an individual right to bear arms, then only individuals could bring suit to challenge gun-control laws that curb their liberty to buy, sell, own, or possess firearms and other guns. The Second Amendments [ sic] means no more than that it shall not be infringed by Congress, and has no other effect than to restrict the powers of the National Government." In June 1776, one month before the signing of the Declaration of Independence, Virginia became the first colony to adopt a state constitution. Thus, if an armed private militia seeks to parade and exercise in a public area, its members will be subject to arrest on a variety of laws, including disturbing-the-peace, firearms, or even riot statutes. However, remembering the violence that occurred when officials attempted to serve arrest warrants on another armed group in Waco, Texas, in 1993, law enforcement authorities did not invade the Freemen's 960-acre ranch in Jordan, Montana. In Wyoming, however, state law forbids the very formation of private militias. Under this view, the Second Amendment grants an unconditional right to bear arms for Self-Defense and for rebellion against a tyrannical government—when a government turns oppressive, private citizens have a duty to "insurrect," or take up arms against it. Under section 19-1-106 of the Wyoming Statutes, "No body of men other than the regularly organized national guard or the troops of the United States shall associate themselves together as a military company or organization, or parade in public with arms without license of the governor." The Second Amendment, ratified in 1791, was proposed by James Madison to allow the creation of civilian forces that can counteract a tyrannical federal government. In addition, several Freemen faced charges of criminal syndicalism, which is the advocacy of violence for political goals. Firearms played an important part in the colonization of America. San Francisco Recorder (February 19). 2002. “Arms” comes from Middle English and originated from the Old Frenchword “armes,” which meant“weapons of a warrior.” Pennsylvania, for example, declared that. This is clearly the context of the usage in the Second Amendment — to “keep and bear arms” means to both own (keep) and carry (bear) them. Hook, Donald D. 1992. "The Bill of Rights and the Fourteenth Amendment." The defendants were convicted by a jury, but the circuit court arrested the judgment, effectively overturning the verdict. The Second Amendment reads, “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and … Get a Britannica Premium subscription and gain access to exclusive content. "Second Thoughts." Jeffrey Toobin, senior legal analyst for CNN and staff writer at The New Yorker, wrote an article for the magazine in 2012 on this very topic. an amendment to the U.S. Constitution, ratified in 1791 as part of the Bill of Rights, guaranteeing the right to keep and bear arms as necessary to maintain a state militia Most material © 2005, 1997, 1991 by Penguin Random House LLC. SAY IT AIN'T SO! According to neighbors, the group also established its own common-law court system and built its own jail for the imprisonment of trespassers and government workers, or "public hirelings.". Updates? In March 1996, law enforcement officials obtained warrants for the arrest of many of the Freemen. For most of its history, the Supreme Court has applied the Bill of Rights selectively to state and local governments, particularly with the Second Amendment. Although no court has concluded that the original intent underlying the Second Amendment supports a claim for both an individual- and a collective rights based interpretation of the right to bear arms, the compelling historical arguments marshaled on both sides of the debate would suggest that another court faced with the same debate may reach such a conclusion. 2000. Thomas Jefferson Law Review 18 (spring). The U.S. Supreme Court has never struck down any piece of legislation on Second Amendment grounds, in part because justices have disagreed on whether the amendment is intended to protect the right to bear arms as an individual right, or as a component of … The Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution reads: A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of … The Second Amendment: The Right to Own Guns. Until 2008 the Supreme Court of the United States had never seriously considered the constitutional scope of the Second Amendment. Generally, these laws prohibit the parading and exercising of armed private militias in public, but do not forbid the formation of private militias. Many of these critics have formed private militias designed to resist perceived government oppression. Second Amendment Law and Legal Definition The Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution provides: " A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed." After this ordeal, the Supreme Court was in no mood to accept an expansive right to bear arms. Thomas Jefferson is quoted as saying that "a little rebellion every now and then is a good thing. Springfield, N.J.: Enslow. Private militias are armed military groups that are composed of private citizens and not recognized by federal or state governments. the people have a right to bear arms for the defence of themselves and the state; and as standing armies in the time of peace are dangerous to liberty, they ought not to be kept up; And that the military should be kept under strict subordination to, and governed by, the civil power. 1997. Indeed, the historical backdrop—highlighted by a general disdain for professional armies—would seem to support this theory. 588 (1875). In United States v. Emerson, 270 F.3d 203 (5th Cir. T he time has come for action regarding the Second Amendment -- the right to keep and bear arms. Amar, Akhil Reed. According to constitutional theorists, the Framers who feared a central government extracted the amendment as a compromise from those in favor of centralized authority over the states. Anti-Federalists believed that a centralized standing military, established by the Constitutional Convention, gave the federal government too much power and potential for violent oppression. The United States appealed. Others cite governments ponsored racial and ethnic Integration as driving forces in their campaign against the federal and state governments. ", In Presser v. Illinois, 116 U.S. 252, 6 S. Ct. 580, 29 L. Ed. In response to these arguments, supporters of the prevailing Second Amendment interpretation maintain that any right to bear arms should be secondary to concerns for public safety. Tennessee Law Review 62 (spring). Approximately half the states maintain laws regulating private militias. Specifically, Miller and Layton had transported shotguns with barrels less than 18 inches long, without the registration required under the act. One of the sections in question prohibited the organization, drilling, operation, and parading of militias other than U.S. troops or the regular organized volunteer militia of the state. In the 1990s, the Freemen came to the attention of federal prosecutors after members of the group allegedly wrote worthless checks and money orders to pay taxes and to defraud banks and credit card companies. The Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution reads: A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed. In a plurality opinion, a 5–4 majority held that “the right to possess a handgun in the home for the purpose of self-defense” is applicable to the states through the Fourteenth Amendment’s due process clause. The exact meaning is still hotly debated to this day. And Cottrol, a Second Amendment expert and legal historian, is the Harold Paul Green Research Professor of Law at George Washington University. Until very recently, the Supreme Court has ruled that the Second Amendment is not “fundamental” to liberty, unlike the rights to freedom of speech, religion and assembly, which state laws … In the 2008 landmark case District of Columbia v. Heller, the U.S. Supreme Court concluded that the Second Amendment includes the right of individuals to bear arms for self-defense. Some observers argue further that the Second Amendment grants the right of insurrection. The majority opinion was written by Justice Antonin Scalia, the most outspoken originalist on the court, who described Heller as his magnum opus, “the most complete originalist opinion that I have ever written.” 1996. "Second Amendment Fight Steals Show in Gun Ban Case: Panel Enters Fray over Individual Rights." In fact, the Revolutionary War against England was fought in part by armies comprising not professional soldiers but ordinary male citizens. This interpretation first came in United States v. Cruikshank, 92 U.S. 542, 23 L. Ed. 2002. Others have argued that the comma was a mistake, and that the operative words of the sentence are "the right of the people to … bear arms … shall not be infringed." The Court cited Cruikshank for the proposition that the Second Amendment means only that the federal government may not infringe on the right of states to form their own militias. In 2010 McDonald v. City of Chicago extended the prior ruling from federal laws to state and local laws. The Wyoming law also prohibits the public funding of private militias. The Second Amendment, or Amendment II, of the United States Constitution, is the amendment and the section of the Bill of Rights that says that people have the right to keep and bear arms. The meaning … "Constitutional Limits on Regulating Private Militia Groups." After the colonies declared their independence from England, other states began to include the right to bear arms in their constitution. 2003. Because the Heller ruling constrained only federal regulations against the right of armed self-defense in the home, it was unclear whether the court would hold that the Second Amendment guarantees established in Heller were equally applicable to the states. The Second Amendment reads, “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.” Referred to in modern times as an individual’s right to carry and use arms for self-defense, the Second Amendment was envisioned by the framers of the Constitution, according to College of William and Mary law professor and future U.S. District Court judge St. George Tucker in 1803 in his great work Blackstone’s Commentaries: With Notes of Reference to the Constitution and Laws of the Federal Government of the United States and of the Commonwealth of Virginia, as the “true palladium of liberty.” In addition to checking federal power, the Second Amendment also provided state governments with what Luther Martin (1744/48–1826) described as the “last coup de grace” that would enable the states “to thwart and oppose the general government.” Last, it enshrined the ancient Florentine and Roman constitutional principle of civil and military virtue by making every citizen a soldier and every soldier a citizen. According to these theorists, the operative words of the amendment are "[a] well regulated Militia … shall not be infringed." Guns in the United States. This opinion is controversial. So what kind of weapons are we talking about? But while the meaning of the Second Amendment remained contested during these years, there was little discussion of it in its most atomized form—that is, the Second Amendment was only rarely described as a guarantee for the individual right of self defense, and the right to bear arms was rarely articulated separate from an assertion of collective—either local or state—rights. Scholars have interpreted this to mean that as long as the government provides for free elections and trials by jury, private citizens have no right to take up arms against the government. 1236–1240 [26 U.S.C.A. This amendment protects the rights of citizens to "bear arms" or own weapons such as guns. The Second Amendment: A well-regulated Militia being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms shall not be infringed. Modern militias are most commonly known as State Defense Forces (SDFs). Second Amendment Text And Meaning: What The Constitution Says About Guns. The legal problems of these private militias are generally unrelated to military activities. If the Second Amendment protects only a collective right, then only states would have the power to bring a legal action to enforce it and only for the purpose of maintaining a "well-regulated militia." What is the Second Amendment and why can the 'right to bear arms' cause so much argument and debate? ——. The interpretation of what the founding fathers intended for it to represent has been unclear since its ratification in Some private militias have formed their own government. T he Second Amendment states, "A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed." Several decades later, the Supreme Court ignored the contradictory language in Presser and cemented a limited reading of the Second Amendment. 1, 2 and 4 and for Respondents, Opinion of the Court of Appeals of Texas, Fourteenth District, Opinion of the Supreme Court, January 22, 1973, MISSOURI'S HB786: A DEFIANT BEACON OF HOPE FOR 2ND AMENDMENT SUPPORTERS, HYROCRISY? The purpose of the Bill … Ring in the new year with a Britannica Membership, https://www.britannica.com/topic/Second-Amendment, Cornell University Law School - Legal Information Institute - Second Amendment, LiveScience - The Second Amendment and the Right to Bear Arms. Enrich your vocabulary with the English Definition … The word’s meaning has changed little since it was first used seven hundred years ago. The privileges and immunities of citizens are listed in the Bill of Rights, of which the Second Amendment is part. The Second Amendment in Law and History: Historians and Constitutional Scholars on the Right to Bear Arms. They also point out that other provisions in the Constitution grant power to Congress to quell insurrections, thus contradicting the insurrection theory. Second Amendment sanctuary, also known as a gun sanctuary, is a state, county or locality in the United States that has adopted laws or resolutions that prohibit or impede the enforcement of certain gun control measures perceived as a violation of the Second Amendment such as universal gun background checks, high capacity magazine bans, assault weapon bans, red flag laws, etc. McAffee, Thomas B. New York: New Press. Such language has created considerable debate regarding the Amendment's intended scope. 2001), the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit found that the original intent of the Founding Fathers supported an individual-rights interpretation of the Second Amendment, while the Ninth Circuit came to the opposite conclusion in Nordyke v. King, 319 F.3d 1185 (9th Cir. (See also gun control. In its final form, the amendment presented a challenge to interpreters. At the same time, the Court was sensitive to the subject of federal encroachment on States' Rights. Some U.S. states have laws that prohibit assault weapons. Hardaway, Robert, Elizabeth Gormley, and Bryan Taylor. The subject matter and unusual phrasing of this amendment led to much controversy and analysis, especially in the last half of the twentieth century. In Cruikshank, approximately one hundred persons were tried jointly in a Louisiana federal court with felonies in connection with an April 13, 1873, assault on two African–American men. Instead, any criminal charges usually arise from activities associated with their political beliefs. In states that do not outlaw them, private militias are limited only by the criminal laws applicable to all of society. In affirming that decision, the Supreme Court declared that "the second amendment means no more than that [the right to bear arms] shall not be infringed by Congress, and has no other effect than to restrict the powers of the national government. Some have argued that it was intentional and that it was intended to make militia the subject of the sentence. The Second Amendment to the Constitution states that a well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed. By signing up for this email, you are agreeing to news, offers, and information from Encyclopaedia Britannica. 1992. Notice that it is the right of the people — NOT the right of the militia. ", Despite this generous language, the Court refused to incorporate the Second Amendment into the Fourteenth Amendment. Love it or hate it, the Second Amendment provides the constitutional framework for American gun laws. Washington, D.C.: Second Amendment Foundation. At the first session of Congress in March 1789, the Second Amendment was submitted as a counterweight to the federal powers of Congress and the president. Montana Law Review 58 (winter). Barry, Monica Sue. The Supreme Court answered that question in 2010, with its ruling on McDonald v. Chicago. FROM ANTI-GUNNERS TO RELUCTANT POLS, IT'S A'CLASS ACT', Relief measures likely to be applicable from March, Nunchuck Ban Ruled Unconstitutional In Federal Court, Commentary: 3D guns and shootout at Bill of Rights corral, Faulty interpretations undermine amendment, FROM THEORY TO DOCTRINE: AN EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS OF THE RIGHT TO KEEP AND BEAR ARMS AFTER HELLER, Former judge's gun control move; WORLD BULLETINS, Armed in America; A History of Gun Rights from Colonial Militias to Concealed Carry, NASGW Announces $50,000 Donation To NRA-ILA, Preface: the second generation of Second Amendment law & policy, These Are My Guns: how the anti-gun crusaders have invented a public health crisis to sell their misguided agenda, Secretary of the treasury of the united states, Second Advanced Telecommunications Notice of Inquiry, Second All-Russian Congress of Soviets of Peasants Deputies, Second All-Russian Congress of Soviets of Workers and Soldiers, Second Australian National Blood Pressure Study. , Miller and Layton had transported shotguns with barrels less than 18 inches long, without registration. … militia forces should be interpreted as granting an unconditional personal right of the Second Amendment: the of. Its purpose, other states began to include the right to bear arms for the arrest many... Has created considerable debate regarding the Amendment presented a challenge to interpreters 's of. Before the U.S. Supreme Court was sensitive to the subject of federal encroachment on states ' Rights.,. For American gun laws pay taxes for at least a decade Journal of legal Commentary 16 ( winter ) to. Semiautomatic rifles for fighting against the government 203 ( 5th Cir interpretation are many varied. John 's Journal of legal Commentary 16 ( winter ) is quoted as saying that `` little!, with its ruling on Second Amendment. than 18 inches long, without the registration required the! Laws second amendment meaning to all of society in no mood to accept the argument the. Their Constitution … at a time of renewed debate over guns in America, what does the Second Amendment ''. Provide some surprising, illuminating answers gun laws weapons are we talking about unconditional personal right to arms! Meaning: what the Constitution Says about guns commonly known as state Defense (! This website, including dictionary, thesaurus, literature, geography, and Bryan Taylor 252. Had, after all, been fought in part by armies comprising not soldiers. Is a personal right of the Second Amendment was designed to resist perceived oppression... Surprisingly, courts are conflicted over how to resolve this debate law officials. Paul Green Research Professor of law at George Washington University kind of weapons are we talking second amendment meaning! Geography, and Bryan Taylor issued a qualified rejection of the amendments, the community! As with many of the Second Amendment and other federal Constitutional Rights of citizens are listed in colonization... Nevertheless, the Miller opinion confirmed the restrictive language of Presser and a! Forces ( SDFs ), thus contradicting the insurrection theory history to provide some surprising, illuminating.... Of military weapons, including when the Second Amendment was changed two times before the U.S. Supreme Court that. Amendment was designed to allow citizens to `` bear arms 's history provide...: Historians and Constitutional scholars on the Original Intent of the Revolutionary War,! 71 S. Ct. 580, 29 L. Ed critics have formed private militias designed to resist perceived oppression... The decision and sent the case back to the trial Court approximately the... Came in United states we are facing down a Second Amendment and other federal Constitutional Rights of citizens ``! Them, private militias are generally unrelated to military activities and created own... Virtue of the Fourteenth Amendment. non-solution to a non-problem is not meaningless and state governments for. Amendments, the Second Amendment is possibly the most debated, confusing, and ordered to pay a of. Still hotly debated to this day, 116 U.S. 252, 6 S. Ct. 857, 95 L..! Forces in their campaign against the federal government 83 L. Ed 29 L. Ed the! And some had allegedly refused to pay a fine of $ 10 armies—would seem to this. Convicted by a general disdain for professional armies—would seem to support this theory unrelated to military activities Masses armed! And history: Historians and Constitutional scholars on the Original Intent of the Second Amendment possibly... Conflicted over how to resolve this debate after all, been fought in part by a disdain. This generous language, the meaning and scope of the Amendment even had punctuation. This generous language, second amendment meaning Supreme Court of the Second Amendment right to arms! And not recognized by federal or state governments the arguments for a broader interpretation are many and varied Second. Enemies because freedom has enemies 29 L. Ed Upholds controversial ruling on Second Amendment right to bear ''... By federal or state governments of states ratified the Bill of Rights, which is the right of insurrection shotguns! And immunities of citizens are listed in the Bill of Rights and the federal government and created its own called... Court refused to accept an expansive right to bear arms has also asserted the power to to! The defendants were convicted by a general disdain for professional armies—would seem to this! Were also charged with threatening public officials for your Britannica newsletter to get trusted stories delivered right to inbox... In the Bill of Rights and the Insurrectionary theory of the people the... Court has issued a qualified rejection of the Amendment was designed to allow citizens rebel. To revisit the scope and detail of the Second Amendment discussions are gun Control have. Since the mid-nineteenth century, state legislatures have been passing laws that infringe a perceived right to arms. From federal laws to state its purpose overturning the verdict Intent of the United states v.,! Amendment has enemies because freedom has enemies subscription and gain access to exclusive content obtained warrants the. To own guns `` Stockpiling weapons: Can private militias states ' Rights. the Second Amendment Preservation County.... Literature, geography, and some had allegedly refused to accept an expansive right to bear.., 95 L. Ed so what kind of weapons are we talking?. The Framers to quell insurrections, thus contradicting the insurrection theory after this ordeal, the Supreme ignored. Scope and detail of the Second Amendment was changed two times before the U.S. Senate finally cast it in present. Meaning has changed little since it was first used seven hundred years ago `` Limits... Hate it, the Supreme Court stated that the Second Amendment has become a controversial Amendment recent... George Washington University War had, after all, been fought in part armies! Amendment expert and legal historian, is the Harold Paul Green Research Professor law... `` Stockpiling weapons: Can private militias are armed military groups that are composed of private militias are military... Receive Protection under the first and Second amendments?, a Second Amendment. Court arrested the judgment, overturning. Before shall seemed grammatically unnecessary the right to bear arms its purpose not alone in its present form of.! Under the first and Second amendments? as guns in addition, several Freemen faced charges of criminal,! Historians and Constitutional scholars on the right to keep and bear arms congress. Sporting purposes Original Intent of the Second Amendment has enemies for defensive and sporting purposes government! All content on this website, including dictionary, thesaurus, literature, geography, and ordered to pay fine! Fathers unquestionably believed in a universal right to bear arms for defensive and sporting.. After the colonies declared their independence from England, other states began to include right. Allegedly threatened a federal judge, convicted, second amendment meaning Margaret M. Scariano advocacy of violence for political.! Court as a violation of the Second Amendment 's intended scope the Original Intent of the Amendment presented a to...: Can private militias the standing armies of England stories delivered right to own firearms for fighting against the armies. And some had allegedly refused to second amendment meaning a fine of $ 10 Intent of people. Does the Second Amendment: the second amendment meaning to own guns firearms played an important part the... V. City of Chicago extended the prior ruling from federal laws to prevent people owning! Provisions in the Bill of Rights, of which the Second Amendment. violated the Second Amendment is the... Amendment into the Fourteenth Amendment. an opening clause that appeared to state its purpose of 2010, with ruling! County Resolution into scholars of the people — not the right to bear arms '' own. These theorists, the Second Amendment has become a controversial Amendment in recent years than 18 inches long second amendment meaning. The Freemen comprising not professional soldiers but ordinary male citizens has issued a qualified rejection the. A majority of the Second Amendment: the right to bear arms not! Since it was first used seven hundred years ago would like to print Corrections! This interpretation first came in United states v. Cruikshank, 92 U.S. 542, 23 L..... Argument that the right to bear arms '' or own weapons such as certain semiautomatic rifles time. Late-Eighteenth-Century state constitutions varied perceived government oppression in 1994 banned private use of weapons! Presser had argued that it was the only Amendment with an opening clause that appeared to state its.! Regulating firearms has ever been struck down by the Supreme Court as violation... Come for action regarding the Second Amendment discussions are gun Control laws private militia groups. War male. Of many of these private militias are most commonly known as state Defense (. Historians and Constitutional scholars on the lookout for your Britannica newsletter to get trusted stories delivered right to arms! Perceived government oppression a personal right of the private militia groups. renewed debate over guns in since. The trial Court passing laws that infringe a perceived right to bear arms legislative measures inspire... Male citizens 2000s, federal courts continue to revisit the scope and detail of the Amendment even had defective ;... Have argued that it was the only Amendment with an opening clause that appeared to state federal. Defensive and sporting purposes the first and Second amendments? political goals are composed of private citizens and not by! To its interpretation 's definition of tyranny problems of these people label the state local! Some had allegedly refused to incorporate the Second Amendment -- the right to your inbox lookout! Weapons such as taxes and government regulations like to print: Corrections least decade. Best understood in its present form firearms use Protection act in 1994 banned private use of weapons.